#Move and Readiness Wording Precision Restoration

E.10.MOVE · Stable · Part E precision-restoration pattern · Normative for move-like and readiness-like wording-use restoration. · Part E - The FPF Constitution and Authoring Guides

#About this pattern

This is a generated FPF pattern page projected from the published FPF source. It is canonical FPF content for this ID; it is not a FPF Reference product feature page.

#How to use this pattern

Read the ID, status, type, and normativity first. Use the content for exact wording, the relations for adjacent concepts, and citations to keep active work grounded without pasting the whole specification.

Type: Part E precision-restoration pattern Status: Stable Normativity: Normative for move-like and readiness-like wording-use restoration.

At a glance. E.10.MOVE restores the exact FPF value or relation hidden by move-like, movement-like, and readiness-like wording. It distinguishes an A.22.CGUS demonstrated row from a Plain local-mantra result and a Plain long-mantra map location, restores evaluation-result change wording to an E.23 prediction, and requires its subject pattern for every stronger claim.

Use this when. Use this pattern when wording such as move, movement, step, action, readiness, route, workflow, or process is doing more than ordinary prose and a reader could mistake a demonstrated continuation, recommendation, prediction, transformation, readiness claim or result, gate decision, publication relation, or performed Work for another kind.

Primary EntityOfConcern. One wording-use restoration over a bounded text span whose move-like or readiness-like wording has an FPF-governed use.

First output. One accepted wording repair, split, or blocker. When later replay relies on the repair, use a temporary MoveAndReadinessWordingRepairNote that names the governed span, claim, object under repair, wording-use disposition, subject pattern, exact governed value and kind, relation signature when applicable, blocked overread, final wording or blocker, and remaining reader use.

Not this pattern when. Use A.3.4.P first when the wording is primarily about transformation, flow, path, process, workflow, operation, or change as a change-situation label. Use the subject pattern immediately when the current object is already known and no move-like or readiness-like wording problem remains.

"Move" is useful in project conversation. It can mean a chess-like next choice, a first FPF use, a TameFlow MOVE, an architecture candidate, a language-state transition, a call-planning next action, a work-preparation item, or an ordinary action. "Ready", "full kit", and "work entry" can likewise mean source currentness, work planning, preparation work, gate passage, or performed work.

#Relations

#Content

#Problem Frame

"Move" is useful in project conversation. It can mean a chess-like next choice, a first FPF use, a TameFlow MOVE, an architecture candidate, a language-state transition, a call-planning next action, a work-preparation item, or an ordinary action. "Ready", "full kit", and "work entry" can likewise mean source currentness, work planning, preparation work, gate passage, or performed work.

The defect is not the word. The defect is letting that word choose the ontology. E.10.MOVE restores the object under wording repair and the direct FPF relation before any rewrite is accepted.

#Problem

Without this restoration:

1. FPF mints a false root U.Move.
2. Pattern-use recommendations become performed work or work authorization.
3. TameFlow MOVE is imported as if it were an FPF kind.
4. Readiness labels become gate passage or work occurrence by appearance.
5. Route, workflow, process, and path wording is repaired through taste rather than through the governed object.

#Forces

#Solution

Cheap ordinary use. When the governed value and its direct pattern are already evident, name them, rewrite the phrase without changing the claim, confirm the remaining reader use, and stop. Do not materialize the repair note or traverse the disposition table. Open the fuller procedure only when the wording remains ambiguous, carries several governed values, imports a source term, or must be replayed later.

Restore the governed target before choosing replacement wording:

1. Name the exact GovernedTextSpan, the ClaimBeingMade, and the ObjectUnderWordingRepair.
2. Decide whether the wording is ordinary prose, a quotation, or wording relied on for an FPF-governed claim. Ordinary and quotation uses can close without inventing a technical target.
3. When the phrase is mantra move, first ask which use is present. In a post-qualification A.22.CGUS demonstrative slice that shows pattern use, recover the exact E.11.PUA PatternUsePracticeContinuationDescription@Context: its proposed use, expected result and kind, PatternID and name, current condition, and continuation disposition. Keep mantra move only as bounded Plain wording for that shown continuation. A.22.CGUS supplies the structure and slice boundary; it does not create a universal displayed-row kind. For a Plain local mantra, name the bounded result and restore the move-like wording through that result's exact predicate or constraint. For a Plain long mantra, name the intended final result and the particular map location whose answer or stop is current, then state the exact answer or blocker and use the subject pattern only as a locator. Do not invent a demonstrated row, collapse the long map into one pattern's Solution, or treat any branch as Work order.
4. When move, movement, direction, or similar wording predicts a later evaluation result, recover ExpectedEvaluationResultChange@Context under E.23. That value is a coordinate-and-scale-qualified prediction episteme, not an operation, transition, movement, work occurrence, or proof of improvement.
5. For every other governed use, name the exact recovered value or relation, its kind, and its subject pattern. For a relation claim, name the admitted direct predicate and actual participants. Add a RelationSignature reference only when an admitted reusable typed declaration is current and the receiving use needs that declaration. If the governed value is already clear, use its pattern directly.
6. Split the text when one phrase carries more than one governed value. A recommendation, method, transformation, readiness claim or result, gate decision, publication relation, and performed Work do not become one value because the same word was used for them.
7. Preserve RemainingReaderUse: the repair is complete only when a practitioner can still tell what can be inspected, selected, evaluated, planned, performed, or returned to next.

#MoveAndReadinessWordingRepairNote

MoveAndReadinessWordingRepairNote:
  EncounteredWording:
  GovernedTextSpan:
  ClaimBeingMade:
  ObjectUnderWordingRepair:
  WordingUseDispositionValue: boundedDemonstratedContinuation | evaluationResultChangePrediction | directGovernedUse | importedSourceWording | ordinaryProse | quoteOnly
  SubjectPatternLocator?: PatternID, locating the pattern whose content defines, constrains, or tests the recovered value
  RecoveredGovernedValueRef?: U.EntityRef
  RecoveredGovernedValueKindRef?: U.KindRef
  RecoveredRelationSignatureRef?: U.EntityRef, referencing one RelationSignature
  RetainedPlainWording?:
  BlockedOverread:
  SplitDisposition?:
  FinalWordingOrBlocker:
  RemainingReaderUse:
  QualificationWindow:
  CurrentnessBasis:
  ReopenCondition:

The governed-value ref and kind ref are both present or both absent. The relation-signature ref is present only when an admitted reusable typed declaration is current and the receiving use needs that declaration. Otherwise a relation claim names the admitted direct predicate and actual participants without a signature ref. A governed use has a non-semantic SubjectPatternLocator: an ordinary PatternID that identifies the pattern whose content defines, constrains, or tests the recovered value. The locator creates no U.Method, U.MethodDescription, or Method-use relation. Ordinary prose and quote-only uses may leave those positions absent and record why no FPF object is being claimed. The ...Ref fields carry references of the declared RefKinds; they do not carry the referenced values or kinds. A materialized note also states the edition, source, context, or time window in which the repair is relied on, the current pattern or source basis for that interpretation, and the smallest change that reopens it. Use [G.11](/generated/patterns/G.11) only when actual refresh orchestration is current; the note merely records its own currentness boundary. The note is a temporary wording-restoration aid, not a project result, method, plan, gate decision, or work occurrence. Ordinary immediate repair need not materialize the note.

#Trigger groups

Run this restoration when one of these wording groups carries an FPF-governed use:

• move, step, action, application, solution, and next action;
• readiness, ready, full kit, work entry, and launch-ready;
• movement, direction, or shift used for an expected evaluation-result change;
• route, workflow, process, path, loop, or flow used for a demonstrated continuation, selected structure, transformation, method, work, gate, publication, decision, or currentness claim;
• imported source wording such as TameFlow MOVE.

The trigger group only opens the repair. It does not supply a replacement vocabulary or choose the governed-value kind.

#Readiness exits

Stay in E.10.MOVE only while readiness, ready, full kit, work entry, or a similar cue still hides which governed value is meant. Once that value is recovered, use the direct pattern:

If the direct pattern and value were already clear, bypass this table and use that pattern immediately.

#No synonym closure

Replacing move with step, action, use, or application does not close the repair. Close only after recovering the governed value and its subject pattern. When responsibility is claimed, name the admitted System, direct domain predicate, actual participants, and applicability, or return the exact A.6.RCD missing governor; an assignment is not a responsibility result. Individuate the responsibility-relation occurrence separately only when a named receiving use needs to distinguish that occurrence. Ordinary-prose or quote-only use closes only when no FPF-governed value is claimed.

#Wording-use dispositions

WordingUseDispositionValue is a local finite enumeration for choosing a repair branch. It is not a U-kind, relation kind, state frame, or claim about the project value being repaired.

#Relation to A.3.4.P

Use A.3.4.P first when the claim is about a change situation or transformation-flow structure. Use E.10.MOVE only for the remaining wording-use question. If the same sentence also recommends a pattern use, claims readiness, or names a demonstrated continuation, split those claims and use its direct pattern for each.

#Durable name repair

A durable name states the recovered subject value or relation; it does not retain an implementation head merely because the fields are typed.

These are repair demonstrations, not a global replacement table.

#Archetypal Grounding - Worked Slices

#Bounded mantra move

Source sentence: "The next mantra move is to compare the two patterns."

Keep mantra move only when the sentence presents one E.11.PUA practice-continuation description inside a named post-qualification demonstrative slice. The description states its proposed use, expected result and kind, direct PatternID and name, current condition, and continuation disposition. That PatternID is a locator; neither it nor the referenced Solution establishes a U.Method or U.MethodDescription. If the pattern choice is unresolved, the description may point to a separate nested selection question. The phrase does not claim a recommendation, method, work plan, performed work, or operation merely by being readable.

WordingUseDispositionValue: boundedDemonstratedContinuation
SubjectPatternLocator: E.11.PUA
RecoveredGovernedValueRef: PatternUsePracticeContinuationDescription@SeminarArchitectureUse
RecoveredGovernedValueKindRef: PatternUsePracticeContinuationDescription@Context
RetainedPlainWording: mantra move, only in the bounded CGUS-demonstrative context
BlockedOverread: no U.Move; no actual work or universal sequence
RemainingReaderUse: inspect the shown candidate, Solution, expected result, and condition
QualificationWindow: the current E.11.PUA continuation description and the named A.22.CGUS demonstrative slice
CurrentnessBasis: the enclosing structure qualifies under A.22.CGUS, the slice shows this E.11.PUA description, and E.10.MOVE admits the bounded Plain wording
ReopenCondition: the enclosing structure or slice boundary changes, the E.11.PUA description changes, or readers use the phrase as Work, recommendation, or universal sequence

#Expected evaluation-result change

Source sentence: "The repair should create an upward evaluation movement."

If the claim predicts a later evaluation result, restore the evaluation pattern, coordinate, scale, current result, one expected scale value, range, or closed direction, candidate proposal basis, and protected tradeoffs. Write the result as ExpectedEvaluationResultChange@Context. If those positions are unavailable, keep a provisional prediction description or use E.22 and E.23; do not call the phrase a completed move.

#Next FPF use

Source sentence: "The next FPF move is to check architecture."

If this is a project-local recommendation, restore PatternUseRecommendation@Context under E.11.PUR and cite the exact architecture pattern being recommended. The final wording may say "next useful pattern use" in ordinary explanation, but it cannot imply performed architecture work or a root U.Move.

#TameFlow MOVE

Source sentence: "The MOVE is full-kitted and ready."

Preserve MOVE as imported source wording. Restore the target WorkPlan or PlanItem, full-kit criterion, A.15.5 work-entry readiness result, and any actual gate decision under their direct patterns. Do not claim target Work occurred unless a dated A.15.1 occurrence is current.

#Workflow diagram

Source sentence: "This workflow is the next move after problem framing."

If the diagram describes a transformation-flow structure or method description, use A.3.4.P, E.18, or A.3.2. If the sentence recommends the next pattern use, use E.11.PUR. If it demonstrates one continuation through a wider CGUS, use A.22.CGUS. Split the sentence when more than one claim is current.

#Evidence path

Source sentence: "Follow the evidence path to approval."

Recover the evidence or provenance relation under A.10, any gate decision under A.21, and any authorization or commitment under the pattern governing that exact relation. A path description neither passes a gate nor authorizes work by resemblance.

#Manufacturing operation

Source sentence: "The next move is to heat-treat the shaft."

If this names the reusable way of changing the shaft, recover the U.Method and its description under A.3.1 and A.3.2. If it places a heat-treatment operation in intended work, recover the WorkPlan or PlanItem under A.15.2. If heat treatment has occurred, recover the dated A.15.1 Work occurrence, affected shaft, method enactment, and result. If the question is whether that intended work can start, recover A.15.5 work-entry readiness. The short phrase does not decide which of these claims is current.

#Clinical readiness

Source sentence: "The patient is ready for discharge."

When ready hides a patient-state claim, use A.19.SPR to recover the patient as bearer, the clinical state frame or subject pattern, the current value or classification, its evidence and qualification window, and the practical discharge use. A discharge recommendation, accountable decision, work-entry condition, and completed discharge remain different claims under their direct clinical and FPF patterns. Do not infer a discharge decision or performed discharge from the adjective alone.

#Reopen when a local mantra is not CGUS

Initial sentence: "The next mantra move is: name the thing."

An initial repair classified the phrase as boundedDemonstratedContinuation. Inspection then shows that the enclosing text is A.6.P's local RPR mantra: a short rendering of the A.6.P Solution. It has no qualifying wider ConstraintGovernedUnfoldingStructure@Context, no post-qualification DemonstrativeUnfoldingSlice@Context, and no E.11.PUA practice-continuation description with the required proposed use, expected result, pattern, condition, and disposition.

That evidence overturns the initial disposition. Remove the demonstrated-continuation claim, retain the local RPR mantra as Plain didactic wording, use the A.6.P Solution and its direct relation-recovery guidance, and write: "Apply the first clause of the local RPR mantra: name the thing; then recover the relation or comparison." The A.6.P locator and Solution establish neither a U.Method nor a U.MethodDescription. Establish a separate U.Method, a qualifying U.MethodDescription episteme, and any Method-use relation only if A.3.1 and A.3.2 independently admit them and the receiving claim depends on those identities. Reopen the demonstrative-slice question only if a later qualified structure and slice actually show a complete E.11.PUA practice-continuation description.

#Bias-Annotation

• Synonym-replacement bias. Replacing "move" with "action", "step", or "use" can preserve the same hidden ontology. Recover concern, relation, and subject pattern before choosing wording.
• Imported-source-kind bias. TameFlow MOVE, workflow, route, process, or path wording can smuggle a source ontology into FPF. Treat such wording as a trigger until the direct FPF target is named.
• Readiness-as-gate bias. Ready, full-kit, committed, or launch-ready wording can overclaim gate passage, work authorization, or performed work.
• Local-wording generalization bias. One direct pattern may define a local move-like expression. That expression does not create a shared project kind; every other use still restores its own governed value and subject pattern.

#Conformance Checklist

#Lowering and Reopen Conditions

Lower, block, or reopen the repair when the governed text span, claim being made, or object under wording repair is not recoverable, the wording-use disposition is uncertain, the proposed wording changes kind or relation without an accepted subject pattern, the subject pattern is missing, a change-situation claim was not separated from pattern-use or readiness wording, the repaired wording loses the remaining reader use, or a stronger source quote is present and remains preserved with quote-only status.

#Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them

#Consequences

Benefits:

• FPF keeps friendly move and readiness language without letting it mint false kinds.
• Pattern-use recommendation, P2W, work readiness, gate decision, performed work, transformation, architecture, and call planning stay separable.
• Corpus cleanup can find move-headed debt without doing mechanical global renames.

Costs:

• Reliance-bearing or still-ambiguous phrases may need the small repair note before they can be rewritten safely; ordinary direct-pattern repair does not.
• Text may need to split one sentence into two governed claims when the original wording carried both change-situation and pattern-use meaning.

#Rationale

Move-like wording is too useful to ban and too ambiguous to leave ungoverned. E.10.MOVE gives a narrow restoration path: recover the governed text span, claim being made, and object under wording repair; classify borrowed or ordinary wording; name the governed FPF value; preserve reader use; and apply the pattern that defines or constrains that value.

The pattern is a child of E.10 because it starts as wording-use restoration. Its mantra branch requires one A.22.CGUS for an admitted demonstrative use row, a Plain local use to its bounded result's direct pattern, and a Plain long use to the subject pattern of the current map answer or stop. Evaluation-movement wording uses E.23 for a separate prediction about a later evaluation result. Recommendation, transformation, readiness, gate, publication, and Work claims remain with their direct patterns.

#SoTA-Echoing

The current best problem-solving line for this pattern is therefore the current FPF recovery architecture. The 2026 language-scent study changes cue preservation, subject to its evidence limit. TameFlow changes only the treatment of one encountered source vocabulary and remains source-practice lineage outside that bounded use; popularity or recency does not give it authority over FPF kinds.

#Relations

• Builds on: E.10, E.10.ARCH, A.3.4.P, A.22.CGUS, E.11.PUR, E.23, A.15.5, and E.24.
• Coordinates with: A.1.STM for a non-CGUS system-thinking long-mantra map location; E.18, E.18.1, A.15, A.21, C.24, C.30, E.17, F.17, F.18, G.11, A.10, and each recovered governed value's subject pattern. F.18 governs a durable-name decision; G.11 governs refresh orchestration only when currentness, edition, telemetry, freshness, or decay is the actual claim.
• Selected by: E.10 trigger scan when move or readiness wording has FPF-governed use and no subject pattern has already resolved the wording.

#E.10.MOVE:End

Last Updated: 2026-08-30 — upstream FPF commit e400eab3 (github.com/ailev/FPF)